Article Hero

SPACs – the initial path to IPOs

1618294192.png
Miguel A. Rodriguez
Miguel A. Rodriguez
05 noviembre 2022
SPACs have raised a record $82.1 billion in 2020 (the U.S market alone), a six-fold increase from 2019. Let us take a closer look at what they stand to understand better how they work.

SPACs - the gateway to IPOs

Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs, also known as blank-check companies) come to life strictly to raise capital through an initial public offering (IPO) for purchasing an existing company.

Their history spans over three decades, gradually growing and expanding. However, the past year represented a breakthrough for SPACs in terms of performance. Many different blank-check firms saw the light of day in an impressive number of other sectors.

Still, SPACs pose many questions for investors when compared to traditional IPOs and traditional stocks. They may present viable opportunities, as well as risks for investors. That's why we're here to tell you more about them, to show you both their pros and cons.

An in-depth look at this type of blank-check companies

SPACs are usually companies in the development stages, with no specific business plan or purpose apart from engaging in a merger or acquisition with another company or entity within a set time frame - U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website.

From the abovementioned point of view, SPACs can be compared to private equity firms, and it's straightforward to see why. SPACs are generally projects established by groups of investors who raise money specifically to buy another company.

Naturally, investors tend to pick the hottest market sectors. Nowadays, industries such as green energy, electric vehicles or fintech appear to be having the most success.

Why did the SPACs market bloom - Traditional IPOs vs SPACs.

There are many reasons why SPACS have had a fantastic 2020. For our case, we'll focus on the SEC example again, appliable to the U.S. market.

SPACs generally face lower regulatory requirements and less SEC paperwork than companies holding traditional IPOs - SPACs can go public on the stock market faster. However, this also implies higher risks.

A company listing its stock via the traditional IPO way must file an in-depth prospectus with the SEC, covering everything from historical facts about the issuer and its past performance to key targets and objectives. Additionally, underwriters (central investment banks) involved in the IPO process play a significant role. For more info, check our short guide on how to trade IPOs, through one of the most popular waysCFDs!

On the other hand, in SPACs' case, underwriters "do not undertake any due diligence on acquisition targets", meaning they're less involved. Also, SPACs aren't forced to pre-identify possible acquisition targets, enlarging their horizons.

Finally, a SPAC must generally complete an acquisition within 24 months and must use at least 80% of its net assets for any purchase. If it fails to do so, it must dissolve and return to its investors their invested share.

The SPAC Market is worth $82 billion (in the U.S alone!)

According to Investopedia, the SPACs market grew from approx. $13.5 billion to $82.1 billion in the past year. If by August 2020 the market was on its way to more than triple compared to 2019, the result at the end of the year showed it grew by more than six times. And apparently, things look to be headed in the same direction.

"Why Have SPACs experienced such growth?" one might ask. This can be attributed to several different factors, such as increased volatility in the IPO market. Also, several significant hedge funds led by high-profile investors have been pouring money into SPACs.

Here at CAPEX.com, you can follow the latest companies going public and never miss your chance to trade the next big thing! Check out the IPOs & direct listings of the world's most popular stocks and be among the first who take action and trade CFDs !

Sources: investopedia.com, thebalance.com, babypips.com.

Esta información/estudio preparada por Miguel A. Rodriguez  no tiene en cuenta los objetivos específicos de inversión, la situación financiera o las necesidades particulares de una persona. El analista de estudios es, principalmente, responsable del contenido de este informe de estudio, en parte o en su totalidad, certifica que los puntos de vista sobre las compañías y sus valores expresados en este informe reflejan con exactitud sus puntos de vista personales, y como consecuencia, toda persona que actúe basándose en ellos lo hace bajo su propio riesgo.El estudio proporcionado no constituye los puntos de vista de KW Investments Ltd, ni es una invitación a invertir con KW Investments Ltd El analista de estudios certifica, además, que ninguna parte de su remuneración ha sido, es o será directa o indirectamente relacionada con recomendaciones o puntos de vista específicos expresados en este informe.El analista de estudios no está contratado por KW Investments Ltd Le animamos a buscar asesoramiento con un consejero financiero independiente con respecto a la idoneidad de la inversión, en virtud de otra participación separada, cuando considere oportuno que es conforme con sus objetivos específicos de inversión, su situación financiera o, sus necesidades financieras particulares antes de comprometerse a invertir..Las leyes de la República de Seychelles rigen cualquier reclamación relacionada o que surja por el contenido de la información/análisis proporcionado.

Compartir este artículo

¿Qué te ha parecido este artículo?

Horrible
Bien
Genial
Impresionante

Leer Más

Miguel A. Rodriguez
Miguel A. Rodriguez
Autor financiero

Miguel worked for major financial institutions such as Banco Santander, and Banco Central-Hispano. He is a published author of currency trading books.