Article Hero

Going public? Here are three exciting alternatives to IPOs

1619069674.png
Miguel A. Rodriguez
Miguel A. Rodriguez
05 tháng 11 2022
Are IPOs a matter of the past? Direct Listings, SPACs, and Reverse Mergers – these are some of the new and exciting ways for companies to go public. Let us look at some pros and cons.

Initial Public Offerings – still investors’ darling?

Generally perceived as the default ways to go public for a company before 2019, IPOs involve many different steps, including a roadshow to persuade investors to pour money and investment banks acting as underwriters to make sure the whole process goes by the book.

In a traditional IPO, companies sell shares to underwriters, who then sell them back to investors as new shares. Additionally, these intermediaries plan and participate in investor meetings. More importantly, they get a commission on the sale of shares after the IPO.

For the reasons above, IPOs can be more suited to attract companies with a robust business model. Initial Public Offerings allow firms to raise money, just like some other options of going public. However, the entire process can be tedious and long for some businesses.

Still, some of the world's biggest stock listings from 2020 were IPOs: Snowflake, DoorDash or Airbnb, to name just a few.

Direct Listings – coming strongly from behind.

 

Direct Listings took the markets by surprise in 2019, when Spotify and Slack went public via this increasingly popular way of raising capital. In 2021, Roblox and Coinbase also opted for this solution.

Experts see Direct Listings as cheaper and less time-consuming alternatives to IPOs. Additionally, companies undergoing direct listings do not have to hire underwriters to help with the entire process. Furthermore, The Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC), responsible for granting stock listing approvals in the U.S, approved the New York Stock Exchange's proposal to change how they do direct listings so that capital can be raised.

But there are also some additional requirements for Direct Listings: companies choosing it must have enough brand awareness and power to complete the deal without much third-party support.

More info on key differences between IPOs and Direct Listings.

SPACs – the new wave is here!

Special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) have raised a record $82.1 billion in 2020 in the U.S, a six-fold increase from 2019. But what exactly are they, and how do they work?

Special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs, also known as blank-check companies) are created strictly to raise capital through an initial public offering (IPO) for purchasing an existing company. Essentially, SPACs go public and then take a private company public by acquiring it. Important names in the investing sector such as Bill Ackman have been involved in SPACs, boosting their popularity.

Some companies can opt to use this listing method to speed up the going public process, while others may choose to raise capital in promising business sectors.

However, with all the growing interest for SPACs, some people have raised a legitimate concern: what if they run out of target companies? What could happen in such a scenario?

Read More info on SPACs.

Reverse Mergers – a close cousin of SPACs?

Revers mergers resemble SPACs. They involve private companies going public by merging with a public company. The already-public company is often trading on over-the-counter markets, according to news.crunchbase.com. Companies going through reverse mergers also don’t have to deal with the intricacies of a SPAC mechanism.

Who are reverse mergers for? They tend to involve companies that have been around for a while and aren’t appealing enough for IPOs, lacking the required market interest. Reverse merger deals can offer a straightforward way for investors in the private company to get liquidity.

A possible disadvantage of Reverse Mergers: no capital is raised, and the private company quickly needs to adjust to comply with regulatory requirements.

Sources: news.crunchbase.com, investopedia.com.

Thông tin/nghiên cứu này được thực hiện bởi Miguel A. Rodriguez  và không tính đến các mục tiêu đầu tư cụ thể, tình hình tài chính hoặc nhu cầu riêng của bất kỳ người cụ thể nào. Nhà phân tích nghiên cứu chịu trách nhiệm chính về nội dung của báo cáo nghiên cứu này, dù một phần hay toàn bộ, xác nhận rằng quan điểm về các công ty và chứng khoán của họ được thể hiện trong báo cáo này phản ánh chính xác quan điểm cá nhân của mình và do đó, bất kỳ người nào hành động dựa trên báo cáo này phải tự chịu toàn bộ rủi ro.Nghiên cứu được cung cấp không cấu thành quan điểm của KW Investments Ltd, cũng không phải lời mời tham gia đầu tư với KW Investments Ltd. Nhà phân tích nghiên cứu cũng xác nhận rằng không có phần nào trong thù lao của mình có, hoặc sẽ có liên quan, dù trực tiếp hay gián tiếp, đến các khuyến nghị hoặc quan điểm cụ thể được đưa ra trong báo cáo này.Nhà phân tích nghiên cứu không phải nhân viên của KW Investments Ltd. Bạn nên tìm kiếm lời khuyên từ một cố vấn tài chính độc lập liên quan đến sự phù hợp của khoản đầu tư, theo một cam kết riêng, khi bạn thấy rằng nó phù hợp với mục tiêu đầu tư cụ thể, tình hình tài chính hoặc nhu cầu tài chính cụ thể của mình trước khi đưa ra cam kết đầu tư.Luật pháp của nước Cộng hòa Xây-sen sẽ chi phối mọi khiếu nại liên quan đến hoặc phát sinh từ nội dung thông tin/nghiên cứu được cung cấp.

Share this article

How did you find this article?

Awful
Ok
Great
Awesome

Đọc thêm

Miguel A. Rodriguez
Miguel A. Rodriguez
Financial Writer

Miguel worked for major financial institutions such as Banco Santander, and Banco Central-Hispano. He is a published author of currency trading books.